Letters to the Editor

Eliminating Safeguards Puts Animals at Risk

2 min read

Editor, News-Register:

The Marshall County Animal Shelter's decision to eliminate essential safeguards -- such as background and veterinary checks -- puts animals at grave risk.

This change was apparently made at the behest of Best Friends Animal Society (BFAS), a multimillion-dollar Utah-based group that pressures shelters nationwide to adopt reckless policies aimed at meeting arbitrary "no-kill" targets.

In Indianapolis, a BFAS partner shelter fired two employees for trying to prevent convicted abusers from adopting animals. The facility had started conducting criminal background checks after adopters hanged, stabbed, and tortured a dog named Deron to death just days after adopting him.

But BFAS urged the shelter to stop screening adopters, and management agreed. According to a former employee, "They argued that going to any home, no matter who it's with ... is better than being in the shelter." The employee resumed background checks after discovering that a dog named Champagne had been adopted by a couple with five prior cruelty or abandonment violations. But when shelter management found out, they fired her.

Rushing animals out of shelters, into unvetted situations, doesn't save them--it betrays them. The humane way to address animal homelessness is by preventing more births, through passing and enforcing comprehensive spay/neuter legislation and offering low- and no-cost sterilization services.

Teresa Chagrin       

Animal Care and Control Issues Manager,       

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals        

Norfolk, Virginia

Starting at /week.